RSS | Archive | Random

About

curious little asian kitty that perpetually has too much on her mind. i like hugs. laughing is my favorite. cuddling is a close second. oh, and i like booze. i'm just living my life one day at a time... and blogging about it. :]


**disclaimer: credit for any artwork, photographs, and anything else posted on here belongs to the respective owner**

Following

31 January 12
nationalgeographicdaily:

Galapagos Tortoise and BabyPhoto: Mandy Quayle
A Galapagos tortoise dwarfs her newborn in this photo released in October by the Taronga Western Plains Zoo in New South Wales, Australia.
The hatchling weighed roughly 3 ounces (87 grams) at birth. It will take 30 years for the baby to reach a similar girth as its mother - a massive 564 pounds (256 kilograms).
Galapagos tortoises are the longest-lived of all vertebrates, with average lifespans of more than a hundred years.

nationalgeographicdaily:

Galapagos Tortoise and Baby
Photo: Mandy Quayle

A Galapagos tortoise dwarfs her newborn in this photo released in October by the Taronga Western Plains Zoo in New South Wales, Australia.

The hatchling weighed roughly 3 ounces (87 grams) at birth. It will take 30 years for the baby to reach a similar girth as its mother - a massive 564 pounds (256 kilograms).

Galapagos tortoises are the longest-lived of all vertebrates, with average lifespans of more than a hundred years.

Reblogged: nationalgeographicdaily

Posted: 4:01 PM

Reblogged: hellogiggles

Posted: 2:04 PM

(Source: themodculture)

Reblogged: mandiebee

Posted: 12:00 PM
allaboutmarilynmonroe:

NPR: A Prince and a Showgirl, On Location and at Odds

There’s an old story about Marilyn Monroe window-shopping with a friend on 5th Avenue, at the height of her fame. The friend was suddenly struck by the fact that they’d walked several blocks together on a busy New York sidewalk without anyone appearing to notice the best known and most glamorous star in all of motion pictures.
Monroe wasn’t in disguise — quite the contrary, she wasn’t even wearing sunglasses. Still, passers-by were simply passing by.When the friend remarked on this, Monroe is reported to have said, “Oh, do you want them to notice me?” Then she reached into her purse for a lipstick and a scarf, and by the time she’d covered her blond locks with the latter, thrown back her shoulders slightly, and taken 20 steps, she was mobbed. Star power was something she had to turn on…

allaboutmarilynmonroe:

NPR: A Prince and a Showgirl, On Location and at Odds

There’s an old story about Marilyn Monroe window-shopping with a friend on 5th Avenue, at the height of her fame. The friend was suddenly struck by the fact that they’d walked several blocks together on a busy New York sidewalk without anyone appearing to notice the best known and most glamorous star in all of motion pictures.

Monroe wasn’t in disguise — quite the contrary, she wasn’t even wearing sunglasses. Still, passers-by were simply passing by.

When the friend remarked on this, Monroe is reported to have said, “Oh, do you want them to notice me?” Then she reached into her purse for a lipstick and a scarf, and by the time she’d covered her blond locks with the latter, thrown back her shoulders slightly, and taken 20 steps, she was mobbed. Star power was something she had to turn on…

Reblogged: allaboutmarilynmonroe

30 January 12
stevensites:

How do you even take a photograph this perfect

stevensites:

How do you even take a photograph this perfect

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 4:00 PM
bohemea:

Scarlett Johansson & Liev Schreiber - Vogue by Patrick Demarchelier, February 2010

bohemea:

Scarlett Johansson & Liev Schreiber - Vogue by Patrick Demarchelier, February 2010

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 2:01 PM

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 12:00 PM
reblogging this because i agree with the comments below regarding this photo…
i think fake nice guys are actually worse that jerks, because at least with a jerk, you get what you see.  fake nice guys are misleading. this is an interesting read if you have a couple of minutes to spare.
thesebootsaremadeforshittalkin:


Regarding ‘Nice Guys’ and ‘Why Women Only Date Jerks’- A Critique of a Masculine Victim-Cult

I’d like to start by saying, yes, I know feminists have already written about this–but it needs to be said again. I wrote this very quickly, so be warned. This is in response tothis picture, which has been circulating.
I think there are some great answers to this lying around somewhere, but I’ll try to answer with some basic points; I don’t have a lot of time to lay the groundwork of theory and whatnot here and have some lengthy introduction, so I’ll jump right to it.
First, don’t assume that all women are the same or that women’s judgement of men is anything but rational and sensible; erase the conception that women are just crazy, open yourself to self-criticism, and figure out what the deal is. I think the answer here lies less in the alleged and imagined inadequacies of female judgement and more in the actual character of the alleged ‘nice guy’–a trend, a sort of character, that I’ve seen before.
We have to separate ‘nice guy’ and ‘good guy’ from ‘submissively polite guy’. You can be assertive and nice, and it seems like some people confuse being a nice guy with being a sycophant or a clingy dude. Have your own thing, do your own thing, but don’t be a self-absorbed douche; this is the essence of being a nice guy without being ‘clingy’. Assertiveness and confidence do not equate to aggression and self-absorption; kindness and respect do not equate to submissiveness and passivity.
It’s also important to realize that being a nice guy doesn’t entitle you to sex. Nothing does. Ever. Being resentful about the lack of sexing for your nice guy persona isn’t cool. In fact, if you have this sense of entitlement, whereby being a nice guy should get you laid, or being a nice guy is a strategy towards getting laid, you aren’t a nice guy. This reminds me of something in this pic that really irks me. This writer acts like being someone’s best friend is an insult. If she’s calling you her best friend, that’s a compliment–not necessarily one that will lead to sex, but if your interest in her as a person is based around wanting to get in her pants, you’re a terrible friend. If you regard being called a ‘best friend’ as some sort of pity prize or second-rate thing, then clearly you don’t value that friendship very much, and if you don’t value the friendship very much, and only see this girl as a source of romance and sex, then you’re probably not really a nice guy to begin with–just a more passive aggressive form of jerk. 
That’s what I’m seeing here, and elsewhere–the fake nice guy, the guy with the nice guy complex, who adopts what he thinks are nice guy behaviors, but maintains a view of women that, at its root, objectifies them instead of respecting them. You can’t be a genuinely nice guy without respecting women. If being nice is a means to an end, and that end is one that places her body and her sexuality above the rest of her personhood, you actually aren’t that different from a jerk–you’re just a jerk with a different strategy. The fake nice guy, the nice guy who’s being nice just to get laid, is basically the same as the high school punk who tries to be individualistic so he’ll be cool; he’s a hipster nice guy. It’s disingenuous, and not nice at all.
The way to break out of this is simple to say but hard to do; you need to break your own objectifying ways and start genuinely respecting women without automatically sexualizing them or grouping them instantly into the ‘screwable’ and ‘non-screwable’ categories. This takes a lot of self-criticism. It’s difficult. I’m not going to say I never objectify women or act like a jerk or even engage in the occasional bout of Nice Guy Syndrome. I do. I try to recognize it and I try to avoid it and change my perspective. It takes a bit of vigilance, and a willingness to let go of your ego. The force of culture is against you; the discourse on women in our culture reinforces the view of women as sexual objects or worthless and takes the value and focus away from their other attributes. It might sounds supremely unpleasant, but you may need to read some feminist theory before you learn how to be a genuine nice guy–including some feminist critiques of the nice guy syndrome (which I will link).
I have two more points to make:
First, quite a few of the girls that go for jerks do it because of their own issues with self-esteem or their male role models teaching them implicitly that a man should be a jerk. Yes, taking advantage of that does make you an ass.
Second, relationships built around the dynamic of you being a jerk to her are not going to be satisfying relationships from the perspective of anyone who’s an authentic nice guy; a jerk would consider sex sans real, emotional connection to be really satisfying.
So, that’s my take on ‘nice guys’.
-Emmett J. Doyle

reblogging this because i agree with the comments below regarding this photo…

i think fake nice guys are actually worse that jerks, because at least with a jerk, you get what you see.  fake nice guys are misleading. this is an interesting read if you have a couple of minutes to spare.

thesebootsaremadeforshittalkin:

Regarding ‘Nice Guys’ and ‘Why Women Only Date Jerks’- A Critique of a Masculine Victim-Cult

I’d like to start by saying, yes, I know feminists have already written about this–but it needs to be said again. I wrote this very quickly, so be warned. This is in response tothis picture, which has been circulating.

I think there are some great answers to this lying around somewhere, but I’ll try to answer with some basic points; I don’t have a lot of time to lay the groundwork of theory and whatnot here and have some lengthy introduction, so I’ll jump right to it.

First, don’t assume that all women are the same or that women’s judgement of men is anything but rational and sensible; erase the conception that women are just crazy, open yourself to self-criticism, and figure out what the deal is. I think the answer here lies less in the alleged and imagined inadequacies of female judgement and more in the actual character of the alleged ‘nice guy’–a trend, a sort of character, that I’ve seen before.

We have to separate ‘nice guy’ and ‘good guy’ from ‘submissively polite guy’. You can be assertive and nice, and it seems like some people confuse being a nice guy with being a sycophant or a clingy dude. Have your own thing, do your own thing, but don’t be a self-absorbed douche; this is the essence of being a nice guy without being ‘clingy’. Assertiveness and confidence do not equate to aggression and self-absorption; kindness and respect do not equate to submissiveness and passivity.

It’s also important to realize that being a nice guy doesn’t entitle you to sex. Nothing does. Ever. Being resentful about the lack of sexing for your nice guy persona isn’t cool. In fact, if you have this sense of entitlement, whereby being a nice guy should get you laid, or being a nice guy is a strategy towards getting laid, you aren’t a nice guy. This reminds me of something in this pic that really irks me. This writer acts like being someone’s best friend is an insult. If she’s calling you her best friend, that’s a compliment–not necessarily one that will lead to sex, but if your interest in her as a person is based around wanting to get in her pants, you’re a terrible friend. If you regard being called a ‘best friend’ as some sort of pity prize or second-rate thing, then clearly you don’t value that friendship very much, and if you don’t value the friendship very much, and only see this girl as a source of romance and sex, then you’re probably not really a nice guy to begin with–just a more passive aggressive form of jerk. 

That’s what I’m seeing here, and elsewhere–the fake nice guy, the guy with the nice guy complex, who adopts what he thinks are nice guy behaviors, but maintains a view of women that, at its root, objectifies them instead of respecting them. You can’t be a genuinely nice guy without respecting women. If being nice is a means to an end, and that end is one that places her body and her sexuality above the rest of her personhood, you actually aren’t that different from a jerk–you’re just a jerk with a different strategy. The fake nice guy, the nice guy who’s being nice just to get laid, is basically the same as the high school punk who tries to be individualistic so he’ll be cool; he’s a hipster nice guy. It’s disingenuous, and not nice at all.

The way to break out of this is simple to say but hard to do; you need to break your own objectifying ways and start genuinely respecting women without automatically sexualizing them or grouping them instantly into the ‘screwable’ and ‘non-screwable’ categories. This takes a lot of self-criticism. It’s difficult. I’m not going to say I never objectify women or act like a jerk or even engage in the occasional bout of Nice Guy Syndrome. I do. I try to recognize it and I try to avoid it and change my perspective. It takes a bit of vigilance, and a willingness to let go of your ego. The force of culture is against you; the discourse on women in our culture reinforces the view of women as sexual objects or worthless and takes the value and focus away from their other attributes. It might sounds supremely unpleasant, but you may need to read some feminist theory before you learn how to be a genuine nice guy–including some feminist critiques of the nice guy syndrome (which I will link).

I have two more points to make:

First, quite a few of the girls that go for jerks do it because of their own issues with self-esteem or their male role models teaching them implicitly that a man should be a jerk. Yes, taking advantage of that does make you an ass.

Second, relationships built around the dynamic of you being a jerk to her are not going to be satisfying relationships from the perspective of anyone who’s an authentic nice guy; a jerk would consider sex sans real, emotional connection to be really satisfying.

So, that’s my take on ‘nice guys’.

-Emmett J. Doyle

Reblogged: thesebootsaremadeforshittalkin

29 January 12
historiful:

Actress Ginger Rogers (1911-1995), with actor Fred Astaire (1899-1987), in George Stevens’ film, “Swing Time,” 1936.

historiful:

Actress Ginger Rogers (1911-1995), with actor Fred Astaire (1899-1987), in George Stevens’ film, “Swing Time,” 1936.

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 4:02 PM

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 2:02 PM
good golly, that’s a lot of books!
arsvivendi:

antejentacularcoffee

good golly, that’s a lot of books!

arsvivendi:

antejentacularcoffee

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 12:02 PM
tamburina:

April 2, 1954: A couple is photographed moments after learning that  their 19-month-old child had been swept out to sea at Hermosa Beach.

tamburina:

April 2, 1954: A couple is photographed moments after learning that their 19-month-old child had been swept out to sea at Hermosa Beach.

Reblogged: ache

28 January 12

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 4:00 PM
Sleep late, have fun, get wild, drink whiskey and drive fast on empty streets with nothing in mind except falling in love and not getting arrested

Hunter S. Thompson (via nickelcobalt

)

(Source: shelovesyou-ya)

Reblogged: ache

Posted: 2:01 PM

adventuretime-blog:

“Cats go meow”

Reblogged: fyeahadventuretime

Themed by Hunson. Originally by Josh